The Ashes 2023: Joe Root & Steve Smith set for summer showdown

您所在的位置:网站首页 batter and batter翻译 The Ashes 2023: Joe Root & Steve Smith set for summer showdown

The Ashes 2023: Joe Root & Steve Smith set for summer showdown

2023-06-22 03:49| 来源: 网络整理| 查看: 265

The Ashes 2023: Joe Root & Steve Smith set for summer showdownBy Jack SkeltonBBC Sport

Last updated on 15 June 202315 June 2023.From the section Cricketcomments469

Then Australia captain Steve Smith (left) and then England captain Joe Root (right) shake hands during the 2017-18 AshesSteve Smith has the most Test centuries of active batters, while Joe Root has the most runsMen's Ashes 2023 - first TestVenue: Edgbaston Dates: 16-20 JuneCoverage: Live text commentary and in-play video clips on the BBC Sport website & app, plus BBC Test Match Special on BBC Sounds and BBC Radio 5 Sports Extra. Daily Today at the Test highlights on BBC Two and BBC iPlayer from 19:00 BST.

Two of the best Test batters of their generation are about to face each other again in the Ashes.

England have Joe Root, with the most Test runs among active batters, on a sparkling run of form.

Australia have Steve Smith, the supreme Test century-maker of the era, looking back to his best.

Who will go down as the greater Test batter? And if you have to pick one to bat at number four, who are you going for?

Smith targets 'bucket list' win in EnglandWhere will the Ashes be won and lost?Ashes recordsA graphic of Joe Root's (left) and Steve Smith's (right) records in Ashes Tests. Root: 2,016 runs, 38.76 average, three centuries, 16 fifties in 56 innings. Smith: 3,044 runs, 59.68 average, 11 centuries, 11 fifties in 56 innings

If you are picking a player for an Ashes series, Smith is the clear winner.

Only Australia legend Don Bradman (19) and England great Jack Hobbs (12) have more Ashes centuries than Smith's 11.

He is fifth on the all-time Ashes runs list with 3,044 - 592 behind Hobbs in second - so will likely end his career as the most prolific Ashes run-scorer since Bradman (5,028). He could get there by the end of this series.

Root averages 38.76 against Australia, compared to 53.82 against all other teams.

All three of his Ashes centuries have come at home, and he has not made one since 2015.

Smith's Ashes average in England (65.08) is better than in Australia (54.50) and his performance in 2019 - 774 runs at an average of 110.57 despite missing a Test because of concussion - was one of the greatest ever series by a batter.

Root said Smith's 2019 Ashes showing was a "phenomenal achievement", especially given the scrutiny he was under returning from a year-long ban for his part in Australia's 2018 ball-tampering scandal.

"It showed how good a player he is, how strong a character he is and clearly how much this contest means to him," Root told BBC Sport.

Style and substanceA graphic of Joe Root's (left) and Steve Smith's (right) overall Test records. Root: 11,004 runs, 50.24 average, 29 centuries, 58 fifties in 130 matches. Smith: 8,947 runs, 60.04 average, 31 centuries, 37 fifties in 97 matches.

Perhaps it comes down to which statistics you value most.

Root, 32, is on course to end his career with significantly more Test runs and likely more centuries than Smith, 34, whose totals are impacted by his ban.

With 11,004 runs already, Root even has a chance of surpassing Sachin Tendulkar's world record of 15,921 - provided he remains healthy, hungry and prolific.

Some will point to England playing more Tests than other teams, but Root's ability to remain fit and focused despite the demands of a busy schedule deserves credit.

As Smith told BBC Sport, Root has "set the standard for English cricket in particular but also cricket all around the world" over the past decade.

Smith has the sixth-best Test average of all time (60.04), has converted 45.6% of his fifties into hundreds and scored a century in 18.1% of his innings.

Root averages 50.24, has a conversion rate of 33.3% and has hit a century in 12.2% of his innings.

We are only talking Tests here - but open it out to all formats and Root has superior records to Smith in one-day and T20 international cricket.

It is not all about stats, though. Who do you want to watch bat?

Root is more aesthetically pleasing, his trademark poise and elegance now supplemented by flourishes such as the ramp shot - having been given more license to excite under Ben Stokes, his successor as England captain.

Smith's fidgety rituals and exaggerated leaves may draw groans from some viewers, but he is a batter of rare touch and timing too, seemingly incapable of being dismissed at his best.

A summer showdown awaits?A vertical bar chat comparing Joe Root and Steve Smith's run total in Ashes series they have both played in. 2013 - Root: 339, Smith: 345. 2013-14 - Root: 60, Smith: 327. 2015 - Root: 460, Smith: 508. 2017-18 - Root: 378, Smith: 687. 2019 - Root: 325, Smith: 774. 2021-22 - Root: 322, Smith: 244.Joe Root has only outscored Steve Smith in one Ashes they have both played in - the 2021-22 series in Australia

Smith and Root have faced each other in six previous Ashes series, but only in 2015 were they both their team's top runscorers.

Root was named player of the series as England won 3-2, but it did not feel like his rivalry with Smith was the most pivotal factor in the outcome.

There are plenty of reasons to hope this summer will provide a series-defining showdown between the pair.

Root will be confident he can improve his Ashes record after a stellar run.

Since the start of 2021, Root has hit 3,181 runs and 12 centuries - no other Test batter has passed 2,000 runs or made more than seven tons in that time.

He is no longer burdened by the captaincy and has thrived under Stokes and coach Brendon McCullum.

After a relatively modest spell, Smith looked ominous in the World Test Championship final win over India as he compiled his 31st Test century - the most of any active batter.

This also could be Smith's last chance to win an Ashes series in England after two defeats and one draw.

So, who are you picking?

Across the BBC bannerGo deep beneath the waves: Hidden cameras give incredible perspectives on ingenious ocean creaturesAre you in need of a good night's sleep? Try Michael Mosley's suggestions for relaxing and dropping offAcross the BBC footerCommentsJoin the conversation

These comments are now closed.

469 comments0Comment posted by 0darroch, at 09:27 15 Jun0darroch09:27 15 JunEven as an England supporter, you'd be mad to pick Root over Smith. Root is class, of course he is, but this isn't even a conversation. Smith averages 10 more in Tests, and 20 more in the Ashes. He's also a better slip catcher. The only thing Root has above him is his bowling, and you're not picking Root over Smith because he bowls a bit of filthy off spin.AReply posted by Armchair Centurion, at 09:54 15 JunArmchair Centurion09:54 15 Junto 0darrochArmchair Centurion replied: Smith's not a bad bowler either, given he was initially selected as a legspinner, he just plays in a side where that hasn't been needed often.JComment posted by jdp1982, at 09:19 15 Junjdp198209:19 15 JunCome on now, Smith is the better test batsman and it's not particularly close. You don't have to like the guy, and obviously his career will always have a bit of a cloud hanging over it, but he averages over 60 which makes him statistically one of the best test batsman ever.SReply posted by Spartacus, at 09:33 15 JunSpartacus09:33 15 Junto jdp1982Spartacus replied: I think you're right in respect of Ashes tests, but not necessarily as Test players overall. Root plays half his tests in England where average test scores are far lower than in Australia. On top of that, Smith has played most of his Test career with the strongest bowling lineup on the Test circuit - Root has had to play a fair few of his tests against that lineup.TComment posted by Trytastic, at 09:36 15 JunTrytastic09:36 15 JunOne is a proven and banned cheat, the other is Joe RootHReply posted by Hawzeeboy, at 10:47 15 JunHawzeeboy10:47 15 Junto TrytasticHawzeeboy replied: Yawn.MComment posted by Martb123, at 09:25 15 JunMartb12309:25 15 JunRoot will be batting against Australian bowlers. Smith aginst England ones. If Root's average ends up lower than Smith's it won't really prove anything about their respective talents .TReply posted by Tim , at 09:30 15 JunTim 09:30 15 Junto Martb123Tim replied: Exactly this.PComment posted by Pete, at 10:12 15 JunPete10:12 15 JunOne of them doesn't get to bat against Australian bowling so that's going to skew the results.SReply posted by Steve Pearce, at 10:23 15 JunSteve Pearce10:23 15 Junto PeteSteve Pearce replied: Yes, exactly. Similarly, one of them doesn't get to bat against what was, at times, a fairly hopeless England attack.YComment posted by Yeahbaby, at 09:24 15 JunYeahbaby09:24 15 Junlooking at the stats Smith is clearly a better test batsman and also in the ashes tests. You can have a preference for your favourite but this is not the questionSReply posted by Shaandaar service, at 13:43 15 JunShaandaar service13:43 15 Junto YeahbabyShaandaar service replied: Exactly, Smith is far better in Tests. Whilst Root edges it in ODIs.KComment posted by KR, at 09:21 15 JunKR09:21 15 JunRoot and Smith are equally good as one another as batsmen. Smiths higher average would reflect the higher scoring pitches he plays on in Oz compared to the lower scoring pitches Root has played on in England. Two different batsmen, two different styles and both equally as effective in their craft. Trying to suggest one is better than the other is a little disingenuous to both players in my view.EReply posted by Easterley, at 11:25 15 JunEasterley11:25 15 Junto KREasterley replied: Only difference in them is one has a more positive body language and a will to win the other is only disappointed when loosing, just the cultural difference of the 2 countriesCComment posted by Cornishman35, at 10:13 15 JunCornishman3510:13 15 JunCheat v Gentleman - Never choose a cheatTReply posted by Tony, at 10:26 15 JunTony10:26 15 Junto Cornishman35Tony replied: and yet England continued to pick Atherton after he was found guilty?BComment posted by billk, at 10:06 15 Junbillk10:06 15 JunOne of them isn't a cheatMReply posted by MTK, at 12:32 15 JunMTK12:32 15 Junto billkMTK replied: Google "mints" and "2005" and get back to me.........But let me guess, you'll STILL be calling it the greatest Ashes series ever.......RComment posted by Richard Green, at 09:45 15 JunRichard Green09:45 15 JunJoe Root bans for cheating zero.Steve Smith bans for cheating one.SReply posted by simple_simon, at 09:48 15 Junsimple_simon09:48 15 Junto Richard Greensimple_simon replied: One should be enough to be banned.RComment posted by Robbie, at 10:24 15 JunRobbie10:24 15 JunBradman and Root didn't bring the game of cricket into disrepute. Smith's crocodile tears are top class only exceeded by Warner.WReply posted by WhatwouldIknow, at 16:37 15 JunWhatwouldIknow16:37 15 Junto RobbieWhatwouldIknow replied: Re Bradman and disrepute: I think some may beg to differ. His Masonic and sectarian hatred affected the test careers of at least 5 players. What of Root in the Bourbon and Beef incident? Smith failed to control a senior team member, he did not hatch the plan. On that score Root must also take responsibility for the (mis)behaviour of players on any tour when he captained.KComment posted by KJB35, at 09:14 15 JunKJB3509:14 15 JunWell Joe Root has never cheated so its clear he's betterAReply posted by Antony, at 10:04 15 JunAntony10:04 15 Junto KJB35Antony replied: Not sure that logic holds up. I’ve never cheated but Steve Smith is a significantly better cricket player than I am - and probably you as well.MComment posted by moonsorrow999, at 09:23 15 Junmoonsorrow99909:23 15 JunRoot has no ashes hundred since 2015. This is not even close.RReply posted by Rae, at 09:27 15 JunRae09:27 15 Junto moonsorrow999Rae replied: 'The better batsman' not the better ashes batsman. Root is pure class whereas Smith is a fidgety nurdler.TComment posted by Tom Pain, at 09:37 15 JunTom Pain09:37 15 JunThey're different, but they're both very good. There, the argument is put to rest.HReply posted by Hawzeeboy, at 10:53 15 JunHawzeeboy10:53 15 Junto Tom PainHawzeeboy replied: If the argument is about who is preferred/ better then your comment doesn’t put it to bed ar all. It shouldn’t however even be a discussion. Too many column inches to fill. I’d rather just hear from Glen McGrath who just says 5-0 to Straya each and every series which is his way of saying just wait for the series to happen.GComment posted by GT, at 09:24 15 JunGT09:24 15 JunI can't see past Smith's cheating. He claims to love cricket but how can he after what he oversaw. Also he's an ugly batter, Root all the way.BReply posted by Bunks71, at 10:25 15 JunBunks7110:25 15 Junto GTBunks71 replied: Let it go mateLComment posted by littleEck, at 09:17 15 JunlittleEck09:17 15 JunOne legend and one confirmed cheat.SReply posted by Sport Report, at 22:03 15 JunSport Report22:03 15 Junto littleEckSport Report replied: Really? 'England Ashes captain Joe Root has been accused of "blatant cheating" for claiming a dubious catch in the second Test at Lord's.'https://wwos.nine.com.au/cricket/ashes-2019-joe-root-catch-marnus-labuschagne-andy-bichel-unloads/18064d6e-d622-4f14-9d1a-2024af3bc994CComment posted by Cymraes27, at 09:35 15 JunCymraes2709:35 15 JunTest cricket - hard to argue against Smith. Especially with his conversion of half centuries into centuries in the Ashes. Their respective runs as captain of their sides are both dubious for very different reasonsBComment posted by bmxkid, at 09:36 15 Junbmxkid09:36 15 JunRoot is amazing, but he hasn’t scored a 100 in Australia.ZReply posted by Zootho, at 13:13 15 JunZootho13:13 15 Junto bmxkidZootho replied: True, but Smith's never had to face Australia's test bowlers in Australia.AComment posted by Alan, at 11:07 15 JunAlan11:07 15 JunI wish the BBC wouldn't post such nonsense, a puerile debate, the standard of journalism has surely reached an all time low.As for Smith, it wasn't just the cheating, others have done this over many years - it was more the attempted cover up and the fact that he threw a young player under the bus that I find distasteful, so his abilities as a batsman are forever shrouded by this sordid affair.KReply posted by Kizman, at 11:20 15 JunKizman11:20 15 Junto AlanKizman replied: Mate, it happened 5yrs ago. Everyone has moved on from it, and he served his ban. You dont have to like him as a bloke, but you can separate the man from the batting art. Easily the best batsman Aus has had since Ponting.RComment posted by Ron Binary, at 09:51 15 JunRon Binary09:51 15 JunThe question is really would anyone except an Australian have Smith in their team ?He's an embarrassment.TReply posted by Tony, at 10:01 15 JunTony10:01 15 Junto Ron BinaryTony replied: How embarrassing that you forget English players found guilty of cheating that still played for England after such as Atherton? I am English and would pick Smith above Root as a batsmen, his stats prove that. That does not mean that Root is not brilliant but simply Smiths record is better.unknown


【本文地址】


今日新闻


推荐新闻


CopyRight 2018-2019 办公设备维修网 版权所有 豫ICP备15022753号-3